BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoNew gender gaplemmy.mlimagemessage-square404fedilinkarrow-up1628arrow-down1110
arrow-up1518arrow-down1imageNew gender gaplemmy.mlBuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml to Data Is Beautiful@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square404fedilink
minus-squarepeople_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoIt very literally is, in South Korea’s case.
minus-squareHawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoHow so? Beginning to conscript women as well as men does not equate to abolishing the military, or am I missing something?
minus-squareOsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoThey could conscript women, but you can imagine how hard it would be for that legislation to pass.
minus-squareExosus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down13·1 year agoWhat? Do you want half the army shopping for new shoes to wear in the trenches while the other half has to wait for them at the shopping mall fountain?
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoWere you trying to be funny, or is that your genuine understanding of women in the millitary?
It very literally is, in South Korea’s case.
How so?
Beginning to conscript women as well as men does not equate to abolishing the military, or am I missing something?
They could conscript women, but you can imagine how hard it would be for that legislation to pass.
What? Do you want half the army shopping for new shoes to wear in the trenches while the other half has to wait for them at the shopping mall fountain?
Were you trying to be funny, or is that your genuine understanding of women in the millitary?